Pokémon Lazarus ROM patcher

Lazarus is an Emerald hack. The base I will name is the US Emerald dump whose SHA-1 is f3ae088181bf583e55daf962a92bb46f4f1d07b7, the same figure as the Emerald page, because that is the clean dump the pret repository documents. The research note says the hack wants a clean Emerald and does not pin a smaller revision inside Emerald. If your dump's hash differs, stop. A patched or trimmed Emerald will fail a source check for the same reason FireRed 1.1 fails a 1.0 patch.

The Rebit guide published on 20 November 2025 calls Lazarus a BPS patch and names Nemo (Nemo622) as the author. That is the article’s publication date, not a separately confirmed release date. Its instructions direct readers to the creator’s Ko-fi page at https://ko-fi.com/nemo622. The BPS label and author-channel attribution come from this one guide; Ko-fi restricted automated access during this review. An earlier planning note said UPS without a public source, so it is not counted as a competing published claim.

Apply whatever file you obtained from that channel with the home patcher. If it is BPS, a wrong Emerald fails closed. If a copy in the wild is UPS, the same failure text can appear. If a copy is IPS, you lose that check. I would not take an IPS of Lazarus from a reupload.

Related pages: Emerald, the BPS guide, the UPS guide, and the Pokémon index. The guide describes a v1.0 release. No newer version or release date is asserted here.

FieldRecord
BasePokémon Emerald US
SHA-1f3ae088181bf583e55daf962a92bb46f4f1d07b7
FormatBPS — 1 guide
Author channelKo-fi Nemo622
StatusBase and format: 1 guide; base hash: 1 repository
Browser ROM patcher with two file slots and a patch button
Pixel-art CRT showing a blank cartridge, used as a visual marker

Questions

Is the patch BPS or UPS?

The accessible guide says BPS, from one source. Verify that the downloaded file begins with BPS1 and follow the current author instructions; an internal UPS planning note is not a second source.

Which page is the download?

I link the Ko-fi named for the author. I do not rank the other sites that use the word official.

Sources